|
A
Review by
Helga Tawil-Souri
Naomi
Sakr brings together scholars analyzing the elusive connection
between political change and media in the Arab world. The book
widely defines the political and the audience: the political herein
includes popular expression, demonstrations, polls, differences in
coverage of political events, and marginalization of certain
populations; the audience is problematized by including journalists,
government officials, NGOs, academics, citizens-demonstrators, youth
populations, and diasporic communities. Together, the chapters offer
contemporary snapshots of a growing media landscape (all but one
dealing with Arab television), providing some informative background
on what is happening on Arab screens and streets. The book fills a
gap of an Arab
cultural studies that until now exists “only as fragments without
coherence or any sense of direction” (168). Based on a conference
in which the contributors undoubtedly dealt with the predominant
question when it comes to Arab media – whether, and how, pan-Arab
satellite TV stations provide a new pan-Arab public sphere – the
chapters are all in a conversation with Habermas’ normative notion
and existing studies on Arab media that deal with that question,
most notably Marc Lynch’s Voices of the New Arab Public.
I would recommend reading Tariq Sabry’s chapter
twice, once as an introduction and once again as a conclusion, for
it provokes the reader to see the collection with a much wider
theoretical and epistemological scope. For any of the shortcomings
that may exist in some of the chapters, they do begin to address –
albeit not all, and unequally among them– the structures of feeling
of Arab societies, peering into the time-space particulars of the
grittiness, ordinariness, and everydayness of Arab culture.
In so far as the volume is in conversation with
studies of the public sphere, Oliver Hahn’s chapter provides a
helpful review of the notion’s European roots and scholarship on
pan-Arab TV that has focused on the question of whether it, and
specifically Al Jazeera, provides a new trans-national public
sphere. While Hahn offers insightful critiques, he only sketchily
touches on a theoretical reformulation of the public sphere, the
common concept threading through the following chapters.
Marwan Kraidy makes the argument that Star Academy,
a widely popular reality TV program, is political because it led to
debates and articulated an alternative view of public participation.
A much less convincing argument is that Star Academy is
political because its soundtrack is based on a counter-cultural US
media product from the 1960s. Regardless, Kraidy addresses a hugely
contested phenomenon on Arab TV – reality programming – and
intertextual responses to it in Kuwait and Lebanon. It would have
been nice to read some audience responses, not only elite reactions
in Kuwait or the better-described popular movements in Lebanon
covered in Lina Khatib’s chapter. The “Beirut Spring” demonstrations
after Hariri’s assassination in 2005, Khatib argues, provided the
first time when “television spoke for the Lebanese public, and the
public was able to speak through television”(29). She brings up many
interesting anecdotes and connects them to a range of issues that
speak to television’s importance as a symbolic battlefield during a
revolutionary time in Lebanese politics: how the demonstrations were
televisual events evolving into an “electronic monument”, and how
the demonstrators possessed a high degree of media literacy in their
renegotiations of media examples and performances that often seemed
consciously made for TV. Moving beyond a concern for virtual space,
Khatib also posits public action’s necessary relationship to
physical place.
Imad Karam’s chapter challenges the hopes of pan-Arab
TV serving as a public sphere by highlighting how a majority of Arab
population, the youth, are still marginalized by its programming
availability. His research is one of only two in the volume that
relies on in-depth research with audience members, in his case 17-26
year-olds in Egypt, Jordan, Palestine and the UAE. He finds that
although new channels (such as Mazzika and Melody) have come into
existence that target – and are popular with – the youth, the latter
nevertheless lack programs that allow them to represent themselves,
and veer away from the didactic tone that most channels use to
address youth (with the host often being an older figure). Through
the interviews, Karam also finds that entertainment programming
provides a needed “breathing space”, in the words of the one of the
interviewees, for youth to distance themselves from individual and
larger problems in their everyday lives. Dina Matar is concerned
with similar issues, but among a different population: diasporic
Palestinians living in the UK. Her chapter is theoretically
well-grounded and the second to look at how audiences engage with
media in their identity “consolidation” and “recreation” (124). In
researching how these audience members think about themselves, their
identity and their community around them (in the UK and in their
attachment to a larger imagined collective of the Palestinian
nation), diasporic Palestinians are in a “continuous negotiation of
positionings between what it means to be Palestinian and what it
means to be cosmopolitan in the diasporic space” (119-120). She
claims that while her informants grew more aware of their
transnational connectivity and their consciousness of a
Palestine-centered identification, they also thought about their
participation in public life of their host cultures, thus, not
simply leading “dual lives”, but intricately participating in a
diverse set of public spheres.
The influence of the “outside world” on Palestinian
society takes a different form in Bruce Stanley’s chapter on media
intervention in Arab countries – with a particularly stronger
presence in the Palestinian-Israeli context. He tracks various media
development strategies by Western NGOs in the Arab world and offers
a helpful typology of those projects. He makes the claim that most
of these media interventions (whether they attempt to back a
particular political option, decrease violence, change societal
behavior, craft political space, or direct themselves to build-up
dialogue, mutual understanding or peace) are constructed by donors
with a “an
idealized version of the media and its capabilities” (152), ignoring
regional and international forces that lead and contribute to
conflict, to structural asymmetries, and to repression and denial of
identity. He subtly, but convincingly, makes the conclusion that
“media interventions for peace are liable to become part of the
problem, not part of the solution” (153).
Let me make brief mention of two chapters whose
methodological and theoretical frameworks regrettably prevent them
from moving beyond obvious conclusions.
Giovanna Maoila and David Ward’s comparative content analysis on
coverage of Palestinian elections by Palestinian and pan-Arab TV
channels leads them to the conclusion that these represent two
parallel TV systems with different production and editorial
boundaries, not necessarily resulting in pluralistic and
better-quality journalism. While Albrecht Hofheinz provides a
convenient listing of popular websites and references on Internet
studies in the Arab world, the multitude of unaddressed problems of
conducting research on Internet-use undermine the chapter. He does
not problematize the connection between attitudinal changes in the
virtual and realm realms; most of his data on user preference comes
from on-line polls and statistics (often from one source); and
finally makes an overly optimistic claim that expression through
blogs and podcasts will “empower” Arab citizens, without ever
looking at whether anyone is listening (or reading) to the subaltern
speak.
Sabry’s
concluding chapter brings up critical concerns about the
epistemological, existential and hermeneutic concerns that should
drive studies of Arab cultures and societies: that scholars need to
better theorize how complex and stratified audiences are. He argues
that the cultural studies tradition is the best epistemic space from
which to situate the specific temporalities within which such media
expressions operate, whether those structures of feeling are
products of colonialism (that Stanley’s chapter indirectly alludes
to) or due to internal power dynamics (as Khatib, Maoila and Ward,
and others address). He suggests that
“what is required is
qualitative research with the potential for investigating the social
world of Arab audiences and their interpretations of it” (160),
which certainly Matar, Karam and Khatib achieve in this volume. In
his call for a need to articulate the relationship between culture
and power, he suggests that an Arab cultural studies should also
incorporate a political economy emphasis as a complementary
perspective. True to form then, Sakr – herself a prominent
researcher on the political-economic landscape of Arab media – has
included Stanley in this volume, but also scholars using other
methodological perspectives: from those who rely on overly
quantitative methods (such as Maiola and Ward, and Hofheinz), to
those who look at intertextual influences in media (Kraidy), from
those who consider a spatial link between material and virtual
expressions (Khatib), to those based on in-depth interviews with
specific audience members (Karam and Matar).
As a whole, Sakr’s volume brings together a
collection of essays that succeed in raising “doubts about the
generalization that can be made regarding television programming as
either a reflection of, or an influence on, what large sections of
the population think” (5). The chapters look at different
trans-national, national and sub-national contexts (diasporic
communities, youth, demonstrators in Lebanon, journalists covering
Palestinian elections, Kuwaiti Members of Parliament, to rename a
few), and to raise the reader’s awareness of the diversity of
audience responses. Sakr’s volume would have benefited even further
had all the chapters truly been concerned with “audience research”
(2). No doubt the collection exposes readers to an array of media
programming, to the specificities of smaller segments of what is
often mis-interpreted as a large mass called the “Arab street”, and
engages the reader with rich examples of a still relatively
understudied area of media research. Sakr’s latest edited volume
explores
the
transformations of Arab media and Arab politics, and the complicated
relationship between these two constantly shifting landscapes.
The contributions
offer readers a nuanced, complex, and contradictory approach to a
vibrant media-politics, and for that, the book is a worth it read.
Reference
Lynch, Marc. 2006. Voices of the New Arab Public:
Iraq, Al-Jazeera, and Middle East Politics Today. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Contact (by e-mail):
Helga Tawil-Souri
Biographical note
Helga
Tawil-Souri Ph.D., is an Assistant Professor in the Department of
Media, Culture, and Communication and New York University.
Her research focuses on
Palestinian and Arab media practices, media development, and issues
around social and political spaces.
▲
◄ |