|
Editorial Introduction
This is the ninth edition of
Participations. In this edition we present three essays
addressing very different kinds of audiences. One is a wide-ranging
examination of audiences for the very popular videogame Resident
Evil. Samantha Lay uses a range of methods to explore
the kinds of pleasures sought and attained by game-players. The
second is a close study of the author’s own interactions with his
very young child. Aware of all the complexities involved in doing
an auto-ethnography, Matt Briggs considers how parent-child
interactions can simultaneously bring into view, and help to
develop, a child’s understandings of a favourite television
programme. In the third essay, Ian Huffer investigates how female
fans of Sylvester Stallone find pleasure, including erotic pleasure,
in his body, and in and through the narratives of his films.
On this occasion, all three essays are
UK-sourced. That’s entirely accidental – and not something I would
like to see regularly repeated (and indeed is rare in previous
editions). But it provokes an ironic thought. The UK, not least
through the contributions of the work and ideas arising from the
Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, has been one (but of
course by no means alone) among the major sources of audience
research in recent years. And what we see in the three essays in
this edition is a recognition of the complexity of questions,
definitions, concepts and methods which has always been the strength
of cultural studies – along, of course, with its sharp critical
reconsiderations of, in particular, the mass communications
tradition.
So, it is a worrying thing to note that,
as we were preparing this edition for publication, the Justice
Department of the British Government was preparing to try to ram
through a new Criminal Justice Bill – a portmanteau Bill, if ever
there was one –containing among a host of other provisions one which
will criminalize the possession of “extreme pornography” downloaded
off the Internet. Even more relevant, from our point of view, is
the fact that the Department commissioned a ‘Rapid Evidence
Assessment’ on whether such “extreme pornography” could be
demonstrated by research to be ‘harmful’. Authored by three people
with no background at all in any field of media research (and,
curiously, assessed by four PhD students …), the resultant REA, now
available, is one of the most appalling reproductions of mass
communications orthodoxy it is possible to imagine. It draws only
on the most narrow range of laboratory-based researches. There
might just as well never have been all the substantial reviews and
critiques of the sources, bases, conceptualisations and methods of
this tradition. It ‘does the job’. In short, the REA is a scabrous
piece of work. That will not stop it being quoted, used, and
persuasive.
In an
early edition of Participations we
carried the debate occasioned by the “Amici Brief” lodged with an
American court, on behalf of an alliance of lawyers, civil
activists, and critical academics. A Journal cannot do all that
much – but we will continue both to try to publish as wide a range
of critically-alert researches as we are able, and to comment on and
engage with bad uses of research in the public sphere anywhere in
the world.
Other resources and organisations in our
field
Participations is, to
our best knowledge, the only Journal specifically devoted to the
field of audience and reception research. But we recognise and very
much welcome that there are overlaps of interest with other journals
and other organisations. We want to contribute to the overall
development of our field of work in as many ways as possible. We
therefore invite all organisations devoted to this field either to
send us an appropriate electronic flyer, or to provide us with links
to a relevant website. As a first step towards this, we are linking
to Intensities, the online Journal of Cult Media – at their
new website
http://intensities.org/.
Also, we want to draw readers’ attention
to ECREA – the European Communication Research and Education
Association – which has an audiences section.
This
page gives details of ECREA’s organisation and activities. See
also their website at:
http://www.ecrea.eu/divisions/section/id/1.
If any other Journal or organisation
would wish to place such a link onto our website, please contact us
via our editorial email address.
Contact (by email):
Martin Barker
▲
◄ |